
Oh my, where to even begin with this book? Unbeknownst to me when I initially started reading it, the author Rob Bell is regarded as one of the big leaders in the emergent church movement. If you've ever heard of the "Nooma" videos, this is the guy who is behind them. After reading the first chapter (or "movement" as he calls them) entitled "Jump," I found myself double-checking and cross-referencing a lot of Scripture that he seemingly ignored or flat-out contradicted. Take for example his assertion that the virgin birth is non-essential to the Christian faith, found on page 26; or his subtle challenge that the Triune nature of God might be untrue and worth abandoning, found on page 22. Bell argues that doctrines like these are akin to springs on a trampoline-- you can remove several of them and the trampoline still functions. WHOA! My friends, these are not valid questions, they are stark and heretical contradictions to Scripture!
The Good:
Now not everything Bell says in the book is false. In fact, I found myself puzzled as I pressed onwards through the book. For a few pages, he'd seem to be right-on in his thoughts and musings-- even expresses a strong desire to read and understand Scripture from it's original Hebraic, Jewish perspective (which I'm all for!). He emphasizes the importance of observing the Sabbath, the meaning behind wearing Tzit-tzit, and the need to understand that Jesus did not come to abolish the Torah, but to explain how it should be properly understood and followed. He also emphasized our need to live like Jesus did, and do so ALL THE TIME, not just within the walls of church or Bible study groups. Caring for the poor, helping those in need, and standing out in the world as real, heart-followers of Christ. I don't disagree with any of those things!
The Bad:
Unfortunately, even after making those statements above, Bell stays far too vague in explaining them. And in the few cases where he does expand on a thought, he seems to contradict himself as he dives headlong into imagery and nebulousness behind many truths and commandments of the Bible, essentially saying that it's all up to however you decide to interpret it. In short, he states a truth from the Bible, but then challenges the fact that it could be absolute truth, by raising pointless questions that only muddy the Scriptures.
The Ugly:
Something very tricky and dangerous is that he does not cite any Scriptures directly within the book, but instead collects them all at the back in an "endnote" section. Amidst these endnotes though, are also quotations from other men like Marcus Borg (watch out!), and magazines like Entertainment Weekly. To a casual reader who was not checking the endnotes carefully, you could mistake a quote from a secular or heretical source for a quote from Scripture. Aside from his challenge of core Biblical doctrines like the Trinity or the virgin birth, Bell lost all credibility in my mind when he misquoted a verse in the Bible to support an idea of his that the Bible wasn't even talking about. By the grace of God, I had just read this verse which is the reason I think I caught it so readily. It can be found on page 128, where he says that Jesus says in John 15:15 "Everything I learned I passed on to you." However, if you look up that verse in the Bible, Jesus actually says "Everything I heard from my Father I have made known to you." That's not just an issue of translation, it changes the whole meaning of the passage in its proper context! In another place in the book, Bell claims that Peter sank while walking on the water not because he had lost faith in Christ, but because he had lost faith in himself. He even uses that false assumption as a basis to make a claim that God's faith in us matters more than our faith in God. Hmm... I wonder what Bible verse that is? Or take for example his claim in the chapter called "Truth" that truth can be found in any religion, and how he thinks that the Bible itself (specifically Paul's writings) was influenced by other religions too! Does this sound right to you as a Believer?
I know I'll probably get a lot of flack for thinking so low of the beloved "Nooma" guy, but lest you think that I am just raising a big fuss, let me just quote Mr. Bell directly from page 67:
“…it wasn’t until the 300s that what we know as the sixty-six books of the Bible were actually agreed upon as the ‘Bible’. This is part of the problem with continually insisting that one of the absolutes of the Christian faith must be a belief that “Scripture alone” is our guide. It sounds nice, but it is not true." (Rob Bell, from Velvet Elvis)
In closing, the fact is that although Bell's "Velvet Elvis" contains some good, accurate Biblical principles and observations, it is peppered throughout with small, subtle inaccuracies and (forgive my strong language) heresies against the truth and infallibility of the Word of God. I DO NOT recommend that you read this book. If my review hasn't convinced you, just Google "Velvet Elvis Problems" to see what much more notable men of faith have to say about it, and then search Youtube for a video called "Rob Bell Exposed." The danger with this kind of literature is that it is so close to the truth, the lies can often sneak right in undetected. Do yourself a favor and take the three hours you would have spent reading this book, and read some of Paul's epistles instead (Galatians, Chapter 1 is an excellent place to start!)


